|
Wolves
Sept 15, 2006 15:57:55 GMT -5
Post by captobvious on Sept 15, 2006 15:57:55 GMT -5
Let's just avoid the controversy here. Baker, you can take Sharks/Panthers. Alex can take Falcons/Surge.
|
|
|
Wolves
Sept 15, 2006 15:58:47 GMT -5
Post by xraycat on Sept 15, 2006 15:58:47 GMT -5
god! why do i get the 70-0 game! side bet overunder 5 all purpose te for vick
|
|
|
Wolves
Sept 15, 2006 16:00:02 GMT -5
Post by Tye Williams on Sept 15, 2006 16:00:02 GMT -5
theres your win not tye will destroy your entire team he wont destroy me *stands proud* Due to the fact I won't be covering you. I get to cover Miller yet again, and he only got 2 passes last week, and that was with Gino throwing to him. Not to mention I stole one from them. However, a Tye will be destroying you. ;D
|
|
|
Wolves
Sept 15, 2006 16:00:46 GMT -5
Post by xraycat on Sept 15, 2006 16:00:46 GMT -5
isnt tye cb? i though that s/lbs took te
|
|
|
Wolves
Sept 15, 2006 16:01:52 GMT -5
Post by []D [] []v[] []D on Sept 15, 2006 16:01:52 GMT -5
nvm, ill sim next week then
|
|
|
Wolves
Sept 15, 2006 16:02:29 GMT -5
Post by captobvious on Sept 15, 2006 16:02:29 GMT -5
It could be worse, Alex. It could be Wolves/Dawgs. The only way that one will be less than 3 digits on the spread is if Fernando decides to fall down every 10 yards.
The only good matchup we have is Thunder/Cougars, and you're in it.
|
|
|
Wolves
Sept 15, 2006 16:02:35 GMT -5
Post by watchthis on Sept 15, 2006 16:02:35 GMT -5
on the 3rd day watch-this created common sence and it was good That made me laugh out loud. ;D
|
|
|
Wolves
Sept 15, 2006 16:06:31 GMT -5
Post by falcon91 on Sept 15, 2006 16:06:31 GMT -5
only way any Tye will touch me will be if i am trucking them to the ground
|
|
|
Wolves
Sept 15, 2006 16:07:35 GMT -5
Post by travis on Sept 15, 2006 16:07:35 GMT -5
It could be worse, Alex. It could be Wolves/Dawgs. The only way that one will be less than 3 digits on the spread is if Fernando decides to fall down every 10 yards. The only good matchup we have is Thunder/Cougars, and you're in it. What a great week for the wolves...Lose there #1 MLB and there only good player for a inactive player, an inactive running back and a WR.
|
|
|
Wolves
Sept 15, 2006 16:12:44 GMT -5
Post by []D [] []v[] []D on Sept 15, 2006 16:12:44 GMT -5
It could be worse, Alex. It could be Wolves/Dawgs. The only way that one will be less than 3 digits on the spread is if Fernando decides to fall down every 10 yards. The only good matchup we have is Thunder/Cougars, and you're in it. What a great week for the wolves...Lose there #1 MLB and there only good player for a inactive player, an inactive running back and a WR. you think im inactive?
|
|
|
Wolves
Sept 15, 2006 16:14:25 GMT -5
Post by travis on Sept 15, 2006 16:14:25 GMT -5
NM I thought we gave you mosca How do you feel about paying 12 million for someone who played 4 games?
|
|
|
Wolves
Sept 15, 2006 16:15:06 GMT -5
Post by watchthis on Sept 15, 2006 16:15:06 GMT -5
The Dawgs take the contract Trav.
|
|
|
Wolves
Sept 15, 2006 16:15:10 GMT -5
Post by []D [] []v[] []D on Sept 15, 2006 16:15:10 GMT -5
NM I thought we gave you mosca How do you feel about paying 12 million for someone who played 4 games? you guys are paying him
|
|
|
Wolves
Sept 15, 2006 16:15:40 GMT -5
Post by xraycat on Sept 15, 2006 16:15:40 GMT -5
hes got a point but had they used it smarter in the offseason
|
|
|
Wolves
Sept 15, 2006 16:20:03 GMT -5
Post by falcon91 on Sept 15, 2006 16:20:03 GMT -5
cuda gave me more money garcia played well but not worth all of the money we gave up for him..the money could of improved the team as a whole
|
|
|
Wolves
Sept 15, 2006 16:20:39 GMT -5
Post by captobvious on Sept 15, 2006 16:20:39 GMT -5
We're only paying him 9 million... I think. There seems to be some significant confusion surrounding his contract. I've contacted both sides to get some clarity.
But we collected 3M from you guys to offset his huge salary. So basically, we're paying him 6M. That's not too shabby for what we're getting.
You guys, on the other hand, spent 4M to get him, then 3M to trade him. Tack that onto the salary of the guy you rolled that into, and you're looking at 9.5M for Allen Miller.
|
|
|
Wolves
Sept 15, 2006 16:23:14 GMT -5
Post by travis on Sept 15, 2006 16:23:14 GMT -5
Actually they made 2 trades that led to gettin him that costed I think 7.5 or 8.5 so giving us 3 mill its eiether 10.5 million or 11.5 million that you spent to get him and get rid of him! Thats horrible gming!
|
|
|
Wolves
Sept 15, 2006 16:26:03 GMT -5
Post by []D [] []v[] []D on Sept 15, 2006 16:26:03 GMT -5
Actually they made 2 trades that led to gettin him that costed I think 7.5 or 8.5 so giving us 3 mill its eiether 10.5 million or 11.5 million that you spent to get him and get rid of him! Thats horrible gming! and you were part of that GMing, so you have no room to talk
|
|
|
Wolves
Sept 15, 2006 16:28:46 GMT -5
Post by travis on Sept 15, 2006 16:28:46 GMT -5
I can talk when I want Kris made the trades without asking me!
|
|