|
Post by Eielson on Oct 1, 2006 9:29:07 GMT -5
Friken Vick, i dont know y he wants to leave this team it was totally dominating the league for the 2nd straight year, what the difference of him being on the Sharks then with us, i just dont understand wtf is he thinking. He could have kept his mouth shut, play out the season and have an amazing chance at winning the LJbowl. Like seriosly who in the fuc*in world did u have it bad once with the Surge? huh? never like y the fu*k does he want out any ways it just doesnt make sense at all, excuse my language im just pretty mad about this whole thing.
|
|
|
Post by XY on Oct 1, 2006 16:13:45 GMT -5
Friken Vick, i dont know y he wants to leave this team it was totally dominating the league for the 2nd straight year, what the difference of him being on the Sharks then with us, i just dont understand wtf is he thinking. He could have kept his mouth shut, play out the season and have an amazing chance at winning the LJbowl. Like seriosly who in the fuc*in world did u have it bad once with the Surge? huh? never like y the fu*k does he want out any ways it just doesnt make sense at all, excuse my language im just pretty mad about this whole thing.
|
|
|
Post by watchthis on Oct 1, 2006 16:16:43 GMT -5
Friken Vick, i dont know y he wants to leave this team it was totally dominating the league for the 2nd straight year, what the difference of him being on the Sharks then with us, i just dont understand wtf is he thinking. He could have kept his mouth shut, play out the season and have an amazing chance at winning the LJbowl. Like seriosly who in the fuc*in world did u have it bad once with the Surge? huh? never like y the fu*k does he want out any ways it just doesnt make sense at all, excuse my language im just pretty mad about this whole thing. Uhhh... I wanted to play out the season. Ty traded me. Blame him.
|
|
|
Post by Tye Williams on Oct 1, 2006 16:33:42 GMT -5
Friken Vick, i dont know y he wants to leave this team it was totally dominating the league for the 2nd straight year, what the difference of him being on the Sharks then with us, i just dont understand wtf is he thinking. He could have kept his mouth shut, play out the season and have an amazing chance at winning the LJbowl. Like seriosly who in the fuc*in world did u have it bad once with the Surge? huh? never like y the fu*k does he want out any ways it just doesnt make sense at all, excuse my language im just pretty mad about this whole thing. Uhhh... I wanted to play out the season. Ty traded me. Blame him. Or you can blame the person who said they didn't plan on returning next season...
|
|
|
Post by watchthis on Oct 1, 2006 17:05:42 GMT -5
He still didn't have to trade me.
|
|
|
Post by falcon91 on Oct 1, 2006 17:24:18 GMT -5
it was better that he traded you instead of letting yo u walk away for nothing
|
|
|
Post by Eielson on Oct 6, 2006 18:37:41 GMT -5
This trade has been undone.
|
|
Serj
co-GM
Jaja I's just you know a hippity hoppah guy
Posts: 798
|
Post by Serj on Oct 6, 2006 19:07:29 GMT -5
Wouldn't Ty have to agree to this? It doesn't seem fair at all that you can just undo it with no approval from Summers
|
|
WilBEER
Crazy People
Macho Mod (in his own mind)
Posts: 751
|
Post by WilBEER on Oct 6, 2006 19:45:09 GMT -5
You can't undo this trade after we poured 4M into Watson. Vick already played a game for the Sharks therefore he is your problem and not ours.
|
|
|
Post by captobvious on Oct 6, 2006 20:56:35 GMT -5
The 4M into Watson shall be returned to the Surge, and the attribute changes shall be removed from Watson's player page... unless the Sharks care to give him a 4M bonus of their own.
|
|
Serj
co-GM
Jaja I's just you know a hippity hoppah guy
Posts: 798
|
Post by Serj on Oct 6, 2006 21:17:39 GMT -5
Why can they undo this trade? I mean it's just not fair to us at all.. like can the Sharks undo their trade of Ty Summers for 3.5 million with the Explosion too?
|
|
|
Post by XY on Oct 6, 2006 21:38:52 GMT -5
I think because it cam eotu right after the trade, so it cudve been like an attempt to hurt the sharks or something like that
|
|
|
Post by Eielson on Oct 6, 2006 22:20:37 GMT -5
You can't undo this trade after we poured 4M into Watson. Vick already played a game for the Sharks therefore he is your problem and not ours. Nice try.
|
|
WilBEER
Crazy People
Macho Mod (in his own mind)
Posts: 751
|
Post by WilBEER on Oct 7, 2006 3:14:50 GMT -5
Still the Sharks got to use LV for their Week 7 game. So can we trade for Bomer Sooner to play for us in Week 8 then cancel the trade?
|
|
|
Post by Eielson on Oct 7, 2006 11:03:13 GMT -5
Still the Sharks got to use LV for their Week 7 game. So can we trade for Bomer Sooner to play for us in Week 8 then cancel the trade? Well, right after he got traded to us he got accused of a punishment and it was something that the GM knew about before hand or else had bad luck and made himself look very guilty. The same option would be available for everybody.
|
|
|
Post by Dr. Mean Joe "House" Jackson on Oct 7, 2006 13:48:10 GMT -5
this is so gay lmao we both dont get vick
|
|
|
Post by xfl2001fan on Oct 15, 2006 17:33:37 GMT -5
I'm not quite following what happened here. Why exactly did we "undo" the Vick trade?
|
|
|
Post by falcon91 on Oct 15, 2006 17:38:23 GMT -5
the sharks got the oppurtunity to un do the trade because of the whole wwatch this drama so what happened is teams are the same before the trade but Surge dont have Vick
|
|
|
Post by captobvious on Oct 15, 2006 19:04:26 GMT -5
The Sharks were given the opportunity to void the trade because the day after the trade was finalized, the Surge GM revealed that Ladanian Vick and Derrick Johnson shared an IP, and further investigation proved it was no coincidence. There was a possibility that the Surge traded him with full knowledge of the violation, and the disclosure definitely hurt the perceived value of Vick, since some form of punishment was going to be forthcoming. The punishment was still being decided upon when watchthis deleted his account and basically decided to act like a dick.
It would be the sim league equivalent of trading a player who fails his physical with his new team.
|
|
|
Post by xfl2001fan on Oct 16, 2006 7:09:56 GMT -5
Gotcha! Thank you Gino for clarifying! Wasn't even gonna read this thread til I saw someone who would respond "intelligently" to my question. Falcon91, thank you as well. (didn't bother to recheck after my question yesterday, until just now. So, that first comment was in no way directed at you. I was just going to avoid the thread if one of our famous "Flamers-posters" decided to respond.)
|
|