|
|
Post by captobvious on Aug 14, 2006 12:37:14 GMT -5
That still says you'd get him for free the following year.
|
|
|
|
Post by watchthis on Aug 14, 2006 12:39:12 GMT -5
Not if he doesn't act badly.
|
|
|
|
Post by ty23 on Aug 14, 2006 12:39:13 GMT -5
I dont know why your worrying about it....he wont play WR for you anyways
|
|
|
|
Post by captobvious on Aug 14, 2006 12:42:07 GMT -5
Not if he doesn't act badly. You can't play someone and pay them nothing whether they act badly or not. |
|
|
|
Post by watchthis on Aug 14, 2006 12:43:19 GMT -5
The pay would be for the next year... The year he hadn't played yet...
I don't think you are understanding this very well.
|
|
|
|
Post by captobvious on Aug 14, 2006 12:45:32 GMT -5
Then please explain it to me. I understand you're saying he forfeits his pay for the following year. That tells me that the following year, he receives no pay. No pay is less than 500k, the league minimum.
|
|
|
|
Post by watchthis on Aug 14, 2006 12:48:39 GMT -5
Unless he would've received it but can't due to detrimental conduct or whatever.
|
|
|
|
Post by captobvious on Aug 14, 2006 13:17:07 GMT -5
I don't recall any detrimental behavior clauses in the minimum salary cap rule.
|
|
|
|
Post by xfl2001fan on Aug 14, 2006 14:39:45 GMT -5
I think Gino has a valid point. The only way that you can have the clause take effect, and still meet the league rules would be to suspend him for a year with no pay. If that's what you mean by the contract you've set up for him, then it's ok. Otherwise, the contract is in violation of league rules.
|
|
