LeRoy Jenkins Press Conference

[Leroy Jenkins]

Hey I'm back and I'm here to ask any questions that you may have for since I have returned.

[Commodor]

Who has the better negative campaign ads; Tom Rayder's committee, or Johnny Brunxa's committee?

[Leroy Jenkins]

commodor said:

Who has the better negative campaign ads; Tom Rayder's committee, or Johnny Brunxa's committee?

Neither, me.

[Leroy Jenkins]

Tomorrow my agent will release I campaign ad I have for the pro-bowl, all I have to say is beware fellow CBs

[Commodor]

who do you think is more likely to be voted to the probowl, Tom Rayder, or Johnny Brunxa?

[xfl2001fan]

Rayder should have it hands down at this point in the season. Brunxa has more pancakes and more YAC, but hasn't moved with the ball nearly as well.

(OHT RB) S. Fox has more yards (936) and YPC (5.0) than (CHS RB)A Watson (836, 4.4 respectively) . The only thing that can be said in my favor is that the A. Watson has scored twice as many rushing touchdowns inspite of his many fumbles.

Only looking at stats, your team has given up 11 sacks in 10 games, whereas the Sharks have given up 9 sacks in 9 games. How that relates to FB's...I'm just assuming that we were both staying back and trying to protect the QB. Naturally, game film is the only true answer (but I'm throwing stats out there to try to make me look better! *grin*)

In our head to head match ups, neither of has played particularly well. You've edged me in rushing, I've edged you in receiving.

Overall, you look to be a better asset, but you are more of a rushing FB (Mike Alstott) and I'm more of a blocking (traditional) FB. Guess it just depends on what style of offense your team is playing!

****Edited Portion Follows****
Rayder has a rating of 67 and his RB is a 68
Brunxa has a rating of 66 and his RB is a 65

When your FB is rated higher than your RB, you are bound to have some rushing issues. In spite of the ratings, my RB still scores more touchdowns!!!!

[Commodor]

wow you just dissed yourself oh well, i'm gonna edge my way out of the conversation.

[Eielson]

I'd take Lorenzo Neal over Mike Alstott.

[Commodor]

still, he only leads pancakes by like, 2.

[xfl2001fan]

I may not knock em all to the ground...but I do get them out of the way. Especially when it counts! I didn't really diss myself either. I pointed out the facts as they are. You are rated higher (by 1 point) and your HB is rated higher than mine (by 3 points.)

The Sharks backfield has 14 TD's on the season.
Thunders backfield has 11 TD's on the season. (these stats taken from week 10 statistics.)

I may never have the statistics you do, but my HB looks like a TITAN next to yours.

[ty23]

Yes but Rayder gets most of his stats in games i sim from the #2 TE position rather than the FB spot

[Commodor]

well, they still count towards FB stats.

[xfl2001fan]

ty23 said:

Yes but Rayder gets most of his stats in games i sim from the #2 TE position rather than the FB spot

It all makes sense now! The Sharks have 2 tight ends...so i don't get to sit in that position!

[Commodor]

well then i do more for my team than you do!

[xfl2001fan]

Bah! That's because your team is too cheap to purchase a second TE. Think of all those poor guys in the minors looking for a team. The Sharks (with the better record) have a second TE. The chumps (that would be your team) are sitting as second rate.

And don't give me the reigning champions...so are the Steelers...and you see where they are. *tongue*

[Commodor]

well the difference between us and the steelers is that we made the playoffs and they won't. plus, they wouldn't be able to find a better #2 TE in the draft.