|
|
Post by Eielson on Jul 24, 2006 15:01:23 GMT -5
If its a keeper you'll want to take a QB later on that is a Freshman or Sophmore since you have a Senior starter Rhett Bomar would probably be a good one. |
|
|
|
Post by Eielson on Jul 24, 2006 15:02:32 GMT -5
Anymore picks? And somebody to keep in mind is Mike Hamilton for later on. He didn't start out getting a lot of carries but towards the end of the year he was doing really good. He ran all over Texas, he had like 200 and some yards.
|
|
|
|
Post by []D [] []v[] []D on Jul 24, 2006 15:05:20 GMT -5
I dont think Marshawn Lynch is the set in stone #2!! I think 1-Bush, 2-Peterson, 3-Lynch!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Eielson on Jul 24, 2006 15:06:24 GMT -5
I dont think Marshawn Lynch is the set in stone #2!! I think 1-Bush, 2-Peterson, 3-Lynch!! I know, thats what I said but there is no way that Bush is better than Peterson! |
|
|
|
Post by []D [] []v[] []D on Jul 24, 2006 15:07:21 GMT -5
I'm not playing with rookies. These guys have all done their research. If he's the #3 or #2 RB in the country, he'll be gone in round 1. And mine could be a keeper, I dont think we've decided.  I'll have to get back with you guys on that one to be sure. Yeah, but there are a few WRs people will want, maybe a QB or two and he is the set in stone #2 runningback. You said he was set in stone as the #2 |
|
|
|
Post by []D [] []v[] []D on Jul 24, 2006 15:08:26 GMT -5
I dont think Marshawn Lynch is the set in stone #2!! I think 1-Bush, 2-Peterson, 3-Lynch!! I know, thats what I said but there is no way that Bush is better than Peterson! IMO Bush is better!! He is way more explosive!! |
|
|
|
Post by Eielson on Jul 24, 2006 15:09:55 GMT -5
Yeah, but there are a few WRs people will want, maybe a QB or two and he is the set in stone #2 runningback. You said he was set in stone as the #2 I meant to say he isn't. |
|
|
|
Post by []D [] []v[] []D on Jul 24, 2006 15:10:10 GMT -5
Eielson, join my College Fantasy Football League!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Eielson on Jul 24, 2006 15:11:02 GMT -5
I know, thats what I said but there is no way that Bush is better than Peterson! IMO Bush is better!! He is way more explosive!! You have to be kidding me. Peterson has more explosion and speed. The only thing that Bush has on him is size (15 pounds) but Peterson is still probably a more powerfull runner. |
|
|
|
Post by []D [] []v[] []D on Jul 24, 2006 15:11:03 GMT -5
You said he was set in stone as the #2 I meant to say he isn't. I figured that was what you meant!! I wasnt sure though!! |
|
|
|
Post by []D [] []v[] []D on Jul 24, 2006 15:12:57 GMT -5
Peterson doesnt have great acceleration, thats why he gets alot of runs for nrgative yards, but he has great speed once he gets going though!!
|
|
|
|
Post by TesT on Jul 24, 2006 15:35:09 GMT -5
New pick...1-4: Steve Slaton (RB, WVU)
*draft board updated*
|
|
|
|
Post by TesT on Jul 24, 2006 15:35:49 GMT -5
another pick...
1-5 Troy Smith (QB, Ohio St.)
|
|
|
|
Post by xraycat on Jul 24, 2006 15:36:12 GMT -5
my boy
!
allright
|
|
|
|
Post by Eielson on Jul 24, 2006 15:36:20 GMT -5
Peterson doesnt have great acceleration, thats why he gets alot of runs for nrgative yards, but he has great speed once he gets going though!! Any 225 pound man that can run a 4.37 can turn it on pretty quick. |
|
|
|
Post by Eielson on Jul 24, 2006 15:38:46 GMT -5
Thats good, Lynch is better than Slaton and you already have a QB.
|
|
|
|
Post by []D [] []v[] []D on Jul 24, 2006 15:39:29 GMT -5
Peterson also had some injuries last season that worry me a little!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Eielson on Jul 24, 2006 15:42:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by []D [] []v[] []D on Jul 24, 2006 15:48:14 GMT -5
That showed me nothing!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Eielson on Jul 24, 2006 15:48:54 GMT -5
You don't think he has acceleration? |
|
too Ty.
![[]D [] []v[] []D Avatar](http://images.bigoo.ws/content/gif/funny/funny_12.gif)
