|
|
Post by Tye Williams on Jan 12, 2007 18:34:08 GMT -5
Were you going to elaborate, or were you planning on stretching this out Argument Clinic style? How about we send them to the Being Hit On the Head lessons?  |
|
|
|
Post by Rubberband Banks on Jan 13, 2007 22:09:58 GMT -5
I don't care that they released me. But they at least should take a cap hit now that I'm unbanned.
|
|
|
|
Post by Director Of Fun!!!! on Jan 13, 2007 22:11:16 GMT -5
I don't care that they released me. But they at least should take a cap hit now that I'm unbanned. I was right, told ya! I told you all! muhahahahaha |
|
|
|
Post by Co-Director of Fun on Jan 13, 2007 23:52:22 GMT -5
Who says we'll still release him if we take a caphit
|
|
|
|
Post by Sady on Jan 14, 2007 12:09:54 GMT -5
he was banned when we cut him and had premision forom the commish to cut him without penalty cuz he didnt know when or if he was gonna unban mott.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rubberband Banks on Jan 15, 2007 11:31:28 GMT -5
Well, I'm unbanned now. I play for the Colorado Cougars. I think there should be cap hit, but w/e. I'm not gonna start an arguement over it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Co-Director of Fun on Jan 15, 2007 18:18:03 GMT -5
But we cut you while you were retired and have already done many other transactions with the cash we freed up
|
|
|
|
Post by XY on Jan 15, 2007 18:33:42 GMT -5
So basically whats going on here is that Ben Mott was banned for a few days, came back, and never retired and the Panthers can cut him without any cap hit at all? Wow lets all stretch the rules for the Panthers but lets not Follow the rules as it says for the Cougars in the Steeves case....
|
|
|
|
Post by Dr. Mean Joe "House" Jackson on Jan 15, 2007 20:05:30 GMT -5
i heared rumors that moot failed a pee test
|
|
|
|
Post by Eielson on Jan 15, 2007 20:15:19 GMT -5
So basically whats going on here is that Ben Mott was banned for a few days, came back, and never retired and the Panthers can cut him without any cap hit at all? Wow lets all stretch the rules for the Panthers but lets not Follow the rules as it says for the Cougars in the Steeves case.... should've never left the Sharks |
|
|
|
Post by XY on Jan 15, 2007 21:49:19 GMT -5
So basically whats going on here is that Ben Mott was banned for a few days, came back, and never retired and the Panthers can cut him without any cap hit at all? Wow lets all stretch the rules for the Panthers but lets not Follow the rules as it says for the Cougars in the Steeves case.... should've never left the Sharks If I knew my team was going to get treated worst than every other team I wouldnt have left |
|
|
|
Post by Sady on Jan 15, 2007 22:15:53 GMT -5
So basically whats going on here is that Ben Mott was banned for a few days, came back, and never retired and the Panthers can cut him without any cap hit at all? Wow lets all stretch the rules for the Panthers but lets not Follow the rules as it says for the Cougars in the Steeves case.... he had been banned for alomst a couple weeks. we were given permission to cut him without a cap hit while he was banned. he was banned at the time in which we cut him. its not my fault that he was allowed to come back after we had cut him |
|
|
|
Post by XY on Jan 15, 2007 22:44:15 GMT -5
So basically whats going on here is that Ben Mott was banned for a few days, came back, and never retired and the Panthers can cut him without any cap hit at all? Wow lets all stretch the rules for the Panthers but lets not Follow the rules as it says for the Cougars in the Steeves case.... he had been banned for alomst a couple weeks. we were given permission to cut him without a cap hit while he was banned. he was banned at the time in which we cut him. its not my fault that he was allowed to come back after we had cut him he made a new account that same day |
|
|
|
Post by captobvious on Jan 15, 2007 23:24:56 GMT -5
I think it's retarded. Dabearfan should have made up his mind whether the ban would be permanent or not before he ruled on the cut situation. The rest of us can't cut inactives without a hit, and you get to cut an active player without a cap hit?
|
|
|
|
Post by Co-Director of Fun on Jan 15, 2007 23:50:13 GMT -5
he had been banned for alomst a couple weeks. we were given permission to cut him without a cap hit while he was banned. he was banned at the time in which we cut him. its not my fault that he was allowed to come back after we had cut him he made a new account that same day ... which was banned |
|
|
|
Post by Eielson on Jan 16, 2007 0:16:54 GMT -5
should've never left the Sharks If I knew my team was going to get treated worst than every other team I wouldnt have left Just drop the Steeves issue. We made the right decision. You shouldn't ever have traded for a retired player. |
|
|
|
Post by Da Bearfan on Jan 16, 2007 1:05:28 GMT -5
I think it's retarded. Dabearfan should have made up his mind whether the ban would be permanent or not before he ruled on the cut situation. The rest of us can't cut inactives without a hit, and you get to cut an active player without a cap hit? There will be no cap hit, and if he is banned again it will be permanent. |
|
|
|
Post by xfl2001fan on Jan 16, 2007 6:56:34 GMT -5
Well that works out super for panthers, un-block him and let him retire. Or else. Or else what? I like how you seem to think you can dictate how this whole league is run. |
|
|
|
Post by Rubberband Banks on Jan 16, 2007 17:09:17 GMT -5
i heared rumors that moot failed a pee test Please do not start anything with me. |
|
|
|
Post by Director Of Fun!!!! on Jan 16, 2007 17:43:56 GMT -5
Well that works out super for panthers, un-block him and let him retire. Or else. Or else what? I like how you seem to think you can dictate how this whole league is run. I know a couple Panther related secrets myself. I dunno Sady, Diop should I tell the good man? |
|
too Ty.
