|
|
Post by Sady on Jan 11, 2007 17:25:05 GMT -5
The Louisiana Panthers have cut the Banned/inactive Ben Mott
|
|
|
|
Post by Director Of Fun!!!! on Jan 11, 2007 17:27:36 GMT -5
He never retired so that's how much of a cap hit?
|
|
|
|
Post by Sady on Jan 11, 2007 17:28:59 GMT -5
none because he was banned and the ruling in the commish's office is that there is not cap hit
|
|
|
|
Post by Director Of Fun!!!! on Jan 11, 2007 17:31:20 GMT -5
I would like this sent to the BoA , he neevr retired he said he quit.
I quit.
Is my player retired? no.
plus anything dabearfan says doesn't matter as he has said we get steve but then sent it to Boa.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sady on Jan 11, 2007 17:33:20 GMT -5
So can we cut Mott without taking any cap penalty? Yes, you can. |
|
|
|
Post by Director Of Fun!!!! on Jan 11, 2007 17:35:21 GMT -5
Unless the Cougars release him, Steeves will be retired for good after this season. He's going to play out the rest of this season with the Cougars. Hey Sady, sound kinda the same? to the BOA. |
|
|
|
Post by Sady on Jan 11, 2007 17:40:54 GMT -5
yeah but u had ppl on both sides of the issue. i dont think anyone will really care about this due to the fact that we r the worst team in the league and its Ben Mott. he was banned for good so that makes him inactive. we can cut inactive players without penalty
|
|
|
|
Post by captobvious on Jan 11, 2007 17:45:23 GMT -5
I would have thought this was a no-brainer if Dabearfan decided the Mott ban was permanent. But he never committed to a time frame. If Mott the person is allowed to return, then Mott should not be forced into retirement.
|
|
|
|
Post by Director Of Fun!!!! on Jan 11, 2007 18:04:21 GMT -5
Mott has an account here.
PLease send to BoA when you hav et the time.
if the panthers game take advantage of a loophole as can we.
Panthers cut Mot we get Steeves.
|
|
|
|
Post by falcon91 on Jan 11, 2007 18:13:26 GMT -5
some one has sower grapes. Cutting Mott doesnt have any affect on anyone but the panthers,and makes them lose a player.
The steeves issue affected every team in the league.
|
|
|
|
Post by Director Of Fun!!!! on Jan 11, 2007 18:15:04 GMT -5
some one has sower grapes. Cutting Mott doesnt have any affect on anyone but the panthers,quote]and give their HB an extra million and sign them Chomsky. |
|
|
|
Post by captobvious on Jan 11, 2007 18:20:26 GMT -5
This issue and the Steeves issue have nothing in common.
|
|
|
|
Post by Director Of Fun!!!! on Jan 11, 2007 18:25:12 GMT -5
This issue and the Steeves issue have nothing in common. Yes they do. |
|
|
|
Post by captobvious on Jan 11, 2007 18:28:35 GMT -5
Were you going to elaborate, or were you planning on stretching this out Argument Clinic style?
|
|
|
|
Post by Director Of Fun!!!! on Jan 11, 2007 18:29:44 GMT -5
Were you going to elaborate, or were you planning on stretching this out Argument Clinic style? Nah, it doesn't matter, we don't get Steeves. I know that. They don't cut Mott without penalty though. |
|
VC17
JV Starter
I am the BEST!!!
Posts: 743
|
Post by VC17 on Jan 11, 2007 19:27:13 GMT -5
finally he is gone.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sady on Jan 11, 2007 21:38:19 GMT -5
A-lew it looks to me like u r the only person who cares
|
|
|
|
Post by Director Of Fun!!!! on Jan 11, 2007 21:39:14 GMT -5
A-lew it looks to me like u r the only person who cares Doesn't matter, this will be brought up in the BoA. |
|
|
|
Post by Co-Director of Fun on Jan 12, 2007 18:09:41 GMT -5
He can't announce his retirement because he's not allowed on the site, they have banned his IP and account I assume, they didn't delete his account so I don't know why you even brought that up.. he's clearly inactive as he has deleted his account, which I think should register as an inactive person... and Da Bearfan, the commisioner said we could cut him, as for you, well that's just too bad, you could have kept fighting it if you wanted him so bad..
|
|
|
|
Post by Director Of Fun!!!! on Jan 12, 2007 18:13:42 GMT -5
Well that works out super for panthers, un-block him and let him retire.
Or else.
|
|
