Lafferty wants out

[travis]

O thats a *counts on toes* 8 game suspensio right? 4 for games played x 2=8

[captobvious]

bucsalwayswin said:

captobvious said:

Here's the smart way to do this:

1) Trade Mosca for Fernando.
2) Bank the 3M difference in salary.
3) Continue earning performance points as a WR, but apply them in areas which will also be useful as a RB
4) Let Mosca walk at the end of this season.
5) Give yourself 3M bonus for season 4.
6) Change positions to HB.

But then we wouldnt have gotten a good WR

Depending on the framework of the deal, you may have gotten Miller in the deal. I was already planning for a future without him. That would have shifted you over to WR2, where you could have had better success against weaker corners. Look at the effect that has had on Marion Bush.

What's really silly is this: you're happy to have a good WR in Miller, but you don't want Mosca because he's inactive. That's a blatant contradiction in positions. Not only is Miller inactive, but his contract expires at the end of this season. So if you don't want an inactive Mosca, why do you want an inactive Miller?

[falcon91]

i got points in the MVP race??? sweet if i did

anyway looks like i will be benched til S6 or 7

[[]D [] []v[] []D]

minihusk said:

bucsalwayswin said:

When did Gilden use too much?

Gilden used 10M but his contract is only for 8M

no, you got it mixed up. He spent 8 M, but he received 10 M. Meaning he has 2 M left.

[[]D [] []v[] []D]

captobvious said:

bucsalwayswin said:

But then we wouldnt have gotten a good WR

Depending on the framework of the deal, you may have gotten Miller in the deal. I was already planning for a future without him. That would have shifted you over to WR2, where you could have had better success against weaker corners. Look at the effect that has had on Marion Bush.

What's really silly is this: you're happy to have a good WR in Miller, but you don't want Mosca because he's inactive. That's a blatant contradiction in positions. Not only is Miller inactive, but his contract expires at the end of this season. So if you don't want an inactive Mosca, why do you want an inactive Miller?

Yeah, i see what your saying. I could have worked it out better. But it still didnt hurt us for next season.

[falcon91]

not finacially but talent wiase it does

[[]D [] []v[] []D]

falcon91 said:

not finacially but talent wiase it does

so what? we are 0-4. We were 0-4 with financial problems. Now me and Kris are trying to take care of the Financial problems, then when thats fixed we have enough money to get talent.

[falcon91]

yes but you cant go further down than 0% apart from stats wise if we were 3-1 and the trades were made you would be able to tell

[[]D [] []v[] []D]

falcon91 said:

yes but you cant go further down than 0% apart from stats wise if we were 3-1 and the trades were made you would be able to tell

yes, but if we were 3-1, no trades would have been made.

[travis]

Ok Ill break it down

Good Descions-
Signing Dwayne Owens
Trading Trav Man
Picking up Bashum
Moving whats his face to WR and leaving whats his face at TE (my idea)

Bad Descions
Trading Travman
Releasing Leroy and Sweetness
Trading Fernando
Picking Gilden
Signing Caddy Baker
Giving Gilden 10 m
Paying 9 million dollars to get Fernando
Getting an inactive WR and a backup CB for the best running back in the league and 3 million

[falcon91]

your idea..was good idea as it kept me at TE and i did well and Guerrero is probably our best WR after switching

[[]D [] []v[] []D]

travis said:

Bad Descions
Picking Gilden

you cant say much about that, seeing that you wanted to pick him also

[travis]

Nah, I just agreed with kris because it was his friend

[WilBEER]

You can't say fernando is the best RB, when LV is still playing RB.

[[]D [] []v[] []D]

travis said:

Nah, I just agreed with kris because it was his friend

I tried to tell you guys

[glow=red,2,300]DONT PICK GILDEN[/glow]

But you picked him. So we will live with it. One good thing that came out of it is Kris can call Gilden and tell him to get on to update his player.

[[]D [] []v[] []D]

minihusk said:

You can't say fernando is the best RB, when LV is still playing RB.

Fernando is the 3rd best behind LV and Fox.

[captobvious]

I don't know how you can call trading Fernando a move that builds for the future. He was under contract for several seasons after this one, and at a very reasonable rate. If you keep him you have one position which you don't have to worry about for years. If you trade him, you should get high value back. You gave him up for two players who are inactive, meaning they'll both be gone next season. You'll have nothing to show for him.

I'd have to say the Wolves biggest mistake is carrying 16.5M in dead money on the books, mostly by trading cash away. And they don't have anything to show for it.

[Ned "Sticky Fingaz" Bashum]

So are the Wolves being replaced after the season?

I think its best for the league and i know that many of my teammates argree

[Ned "Sticky Fingaz" Bashum]

travis said:

Ok Ill break it down

Good Descions-
Signing Dwayne Owens
Trading Trav Man
Picking up Bashum
Moving whats his face to WR and leaving whats his face at TE (my idea)

Bad Descions
Trading Travman
Releasing Leroy and Sweetness
Trading Fernando
Picking Gilden
Signing Caddy Baker
Giving Gilden 10 m
Paying 9 million dollars to get Fernando
Getting an inactive WR and a backup CB for the best running back in the league and 3 million

Wow I'm Flattered

[Jordan Allan]

captobvious said:

I don't know how you can call trading Fernando a move that builds for the future. He was under contract for several seasons after this one, and at a very reasonable rate. If you keep him you have one position which you don't have to worry about for years. If you trade him, you should get high value back. You gave him up for two players who are inactive, meaning they'll both be gone next season. You'll have nothing to show for him.

I'd have to say the Wolves biggest mistake is carrying 16.5M in dead money on the books, mostly by trading cash away. And they don't have anything to show for it.

but Gino, that option means Baker doesn't get his way Poor Baker. Everyone's out to get him.