Two more expansion teams for next season?

[Ned "Sticky Fingaz" Bashum]

I belive we should add two more. We could do one and have a bye week but two sounds better. I bring this up becasue of the shortage of spots on teams. The number of free agents is growing and some went to minorsa. I say we either add two expansion teams or move to minor teams to the FSL. I dont care how we do as long as we have more teams for more players.

[Da Bearfan]

I'm thinking about doing one of two things:

1. Have a thread with everyone active, and get rid of all the non-active players.

2. Create 2 more expansion teams.

[travis]

Give me and mr.turtle teams, actually I think that Eielson deserves his own, Stlouis, Tye, Overlord, Me

[captobvious]

I don't think we have enough free agents to fill out two more teams. I'd rather get rid of inactives to make room.

[Co-Director of Fun]

And it's a little early right now as it is, we have gone 25% through the season

[Ned "Sticky Fingaz" Bashum]

ok rid of inactives!

[xfl2001fan]

Can we ensure that we have a clear, concise definition of "inactive" posted so that everyone understands what the rule is? (i.e. How many days of inactivity before you are moved elsewhere?) Also, for those who are generally active, but have spots of inactivity (me) due to outside measures...what do we do for that? I just want to make sure that the next time Uncle Sam has decided to send me somewhere for like 2 weeks with no Internet capabilities, I don't find that I've been replaced by some new guy (not that there's a lot of FB free agents that I'm aware of)

[WilBEER]

travis said:

Give me and mr.turtle teams, actually I think that Eielson deserves his own, Stlouis, Tye, Overlord, Me

You forgot me.

[Kris Johnson]

Well, I would think removing all in-active people and having a fantasy draft next season to even all teams up would be nice. But, that would hurt what Surge and Sharks did in existence.

[overlord]

we can get rid of the inactive people but we shouldn't have a fantasy draft.

[Da Bearfan]

We're not gonna have a draft, there is no way. The way we'll get rid of inactives is: I'll make a thread that is an announcement titled something like activity check. Then, everyone must post in that thread. Whoever doesn't post will be considered inactive and be retired at the end of the season.

[xraycat]

kris said:

Well, I would think removing all in-active people and having a fantasy draft next season to even all teams up would be nice. But, that would hurt what Surge and Sharks did in existence.

thats actually not a bad idea if ALL gm's agree give the league a shake up most teams would be the same though i think loyalty and such

[Da Bearfan]

IF we were to do that, we could have each team keep like 3 players or something.

[overlord]

I don't think that would work. If nobody is at your postion that you are trying to replace you can convert somebody there and maybe they can change there attributes so you aren't totally screwed when trying to replace him.

[KJ [Thunda Pride!]]

I think that isn't a very good idea...

[xraycat]

so i think dabearshould make the thread do it early so you dont get left out

[captobvious]

xraycat said:

kris said:

Well, I would think removing all in-active people and having a fantasy draft next season to even all teams up would be nice. But, that would hurt what Surge and Sharks did in existence.

thats actually not a bad idea if ALL gm's agree give the league a shake up most teams would be the same though i think loyalty and such

I can't even begin to describe how much I hate that idea in less than 1000 words.

[xraycat]

it'd be fun
sort of

[overlord]

I don't even think you would get half the gms to agree with that. It just doesn't look like it will work. It will help expansion teams get better and be on par with the rest of the league but it isn't fair to the teams that just happen to be better then everybody else.

[xraycat]

exactly can we make the activity thread so noone gets left out