|
|
Post by Eielson on Aug 13, 2006 13:23:09 GMT -5
hahahaha thanks for that Gino, I needed a good laugh Keep laughing. You should have seen me laughing when I put up 45 points against your defense as a rookie with two games under my belt. Maybe you guys will D-up and hold me to 60 this time around. Actually, I don't know why I'm getting into these arguments. The last team to pat themselves on the back this much in the preseason was the Falcons, and we all know how that turned out. Your offense doesn't have a great back and your receivers aren't anything too great. The Sharks and Surge are both better at each of those positions. |
|
|
|
Post by captobvious on Aug 13, 2006 13:32:39 GMT -5
I understand you have the need to talk bad about my team in order to make yours look better for free agents. But no matter what you say, you're still the team that barely made the playoffs ahead of a first-year expansion team.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eielson on Aug 13, 2006 13:42:50 GMT -5
I understand you have the need to talk bad about my team in order to make yours look better for free agents. But no matter what you say, you're still the team that barely made the playoffs ahead of a first-year expansion team. We are also still the team that went 4-0 against you. |
|
WilBEER
Crazy People 
Macho Mod (in his own mind)
Posts: 751
|
Post by WilBEER on Aug 13, 2006 13:44:26 GMT -5
I understand you have the need to talk bad about my team in order to make yours look better for free agents. But no matter what you say, you're still the team that barely made the playoffs ahead of a first-year expansion team. Since my arrival the Surge have: Week 7: Surge 24Dawgs 17 Week 8: Surge: 49Cougars: 17 Week 9: Surge: 24Thunder: 34 Week 10: Surge 56Falcons 14 Week 11: Surge 59Cogars: 31 Week 13: Surge 56Falcons: 28 Rd 1: Surge 60Cougars 53 LJB Game 1: Surge 17Thunder 24 LJB Game 2: Surge 7Thunder 28 Never once do I see the Cougars or the Dawgs beating us. We had 1 close game against the Cougars, thats it. "Anything can happen on an given Sunday." |
|
|
|
Post by Eielson on Aug 13, 2006 13:45:43 GMT -5
I understand you have the need to talk bad about my team in order to make yours look better for free agents. But no matter what you say, you're still the team that barely made the playoffs ahead of a first-year expansion team. Since my arrival the Surge have: Week 7: Surge 24Dawgs 17 Week 8: Surge: 49Cougars: 17 Week 9: Surge: 24Thunder: 34 Week 10: Surge 56Falcons 14 Week 11: Surge 59Cogars: 31 Week 13: Surge 56Falcons: 28 Rd 1: Surge 60Cougars 53 LJB Game 1: Surge 17Thunder 24 LJB Game 2: Surge 7Thunder 28 Never once do I see the Cougars or the Dawgs beating us. We had 1 close game against the Cougars, thats it. "Anything can happen on an given Sunday." He was talking to me. |
|
|
|
Post by captobvious on Aug 13, 2006 13:47:07 GMT -5
You guys only beat us by a touchdown in the rematch. I call that close.
|
|
WilBEER
Crazy People
Macho Mod (in his own mind)
Posts: 751
|
Post by WilBEER on Aug 13, 2006 13:47:30 GMT -5
I understand you have the need to talk bad about my team in order to make yours look better for free agents. We don't need to talk bad about your team when your team din't even make the playoofs and we made it to the LJB bowl. How many players on your team are active? By active I mean on every day? When was the last time your WRs were online? Where is your GM, flledge? |
|
WilBEER
Crazy People
Macho Mod (in his own mind)
Posts: 751
|
Post by WilBEER on Aug 13, 2006 13:50:44 GMT -5
You guys only beat us by a touchdown in the rematch. I call that close. It was 24-9. We let up and let you guys come back. Shoot, if we are calling 7 pt games a win for the losers, then the Surge won the LJB Game 1 since we lost by 7. But wait 7 pts is a close game, therefore the Surge actually win, according to capt. |
|
|
|
Post by Tye Williams on Aug 13, 2006 13:55:17 GMT -5
Since when did we start to use negativity to resort to getting free agents? I wouldn't want to play for a team that's too busy putting down others while failing to make a case for itself.
|
|
|
|
Post by ty23 on Aug 13, 2006 13:59:26 GMT -5
Tye thats just because your team is the worst so you have noone to pick on haha
|
|
|
|
Post by Eielson on Aug 13, 2006 14:00:14 GMT -5
This has nothing to do with getting free agents, I just don't see how Captobvious can say that the Sharks don't have a better offense than the Dawgs.
|
|
|
|
Post by captobvious on Aug 13, 2006 14:35:31 GMT -5
You guys only beat us by a touchdown in the rematch. I call that close. It was 24-9. We let up and let you guys come back. Shoot, if we are calling 7 pt games a win for the losers, then the Surge won the LJB Game 1 since we lost by 7. But wait 7 pts is a close game, therefore the Surge actually win, according to capt. This is the stupidest thing you've ever said. And that's something that has a lot of competition. Personally, I hope you handle your draft better than you did for the Falcons. |
|
|
|
Post by captobvious on Aug 13, 2006 15:19:43 GMT -5
This has nothing to do with getting free agents, I just don't see how Captobvious can say that the Sharks don't have a better offense than the Dawgs. Manning/DeBomb - wash Watson/Mosca - advantage Sharks Sooner+nobody/Holt+Manery+Miller - huge advantage Dawgs Sexxxy/Beast - slight advantage Dawgs Ummm... that's why. |
|
|
|
Post by watchthis on Aug 13, 2006 15:21:04 GMT -5
I would give the advantage to Sexxxy over Beast.
|
|
|
|
Post by travis on Aug 13, 2006 15:21:36 GMT -5
I still dont see you winning it next year.
|
|
|
|
Post by captobvious on Aug 13, 2006 15:26:05 GMT -5
Beast had more catches and more yards from a QB who still needed a lot of work. Sexxxy just managed to be standing in the endzone when a lot of those balls came his way.
Plus, I recall you saying something about Beast making catches with his athleticism versus Sexxxy making catches because people forgot about him.
Either way, it doesn't matter. The fact is that with Holt on our team we'd have 4 outstanding receivers to Manning's two.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eielson on Aug 13, 2006 15:27:51 GMT -5
This has nothing to do with getting free agents, I just don't see how Captobvious can say that the Sharks don't have a better offense than the Dawgs. Manning/DeBomb - wash Watson/Mosca - advantage Sharks Sooner+nobody/Holt+Manery+Miller - huge advantage Dawgs Sexxxy/Beast - slight advantage Dawgs Ummm... that's why. haha, except manning is better, maybe not a ton but still is and you have Holt on the wrong side. |
|
|
|
Post by travis on Aug 13, 2006 15:29:18 GMT -5
Eielson your not gonna get holt witht he contract capt offered
|
|
WilBEER
Crazy People
Macho Mod (in his own mind)
Posts: 751
|
Post by WilBEER on Aug 13, 2006 15:30:17 GMT -5
Manning/DeBomb - Manning
Watson/Mosca - Sharks
Sooner+nobody/Holt+Manery+Miller - Can't compare bc Holt hasn't decided yet, so this is a tie
Sexxxy/Beast - Sexxxy, who cares how many yards he has but isn't the points what we care most about
|
|
|
|
Post by captobvious on Aug 13, 2006 15:30:40 GMT -5
My contract turns Holt into the next Steeves.
|
|
too Ty.
