|
|
Post by travis on Aug 13, 2006 15:30:49 GMT -5
Id say Gino's is more accurate than that.
|
|
|
|
Post by captobvious on Aug 13, 2006 15:31:29 GMT -5
Manning/DeBomb - Manning Watson/Mosca - Sharks Sooner+nobody/Holt+Manery+Miller - Can't compare bc Holt hasn't decided yet, so this is a tie Sexxxy/Beast - Sexxxy, who cares how many yards he has but isn't the points what we care most about Are you saying Sooner by himself is better than Manery and Miller combined? Now you're really losing it. |
|
|
|
Post by Eielson on Aug 13, 2006 15:32:16 GMT -5
My contract turns Holt into the next Steeves. Okay, well I'm the first Steeves and I still say we will end up with Holt. |
|
WilBEER
Crazy People 
Macho Mod (in his own mind)
Posts: 751
|
Post by WilBEER on Aug 13, 2006 15:33:02 GMT -5
Manning/DeBomb - Manning Watson/Mosca - Sharks Sooner+nobody/Holt+Manery+Miller - Can't compare bc Holt hasn't decided yet, so this is a tie Sexxxy/Beast - Sexxxy, who cares how many yards he has but isn't the points what we care most about Are you saying Sooner by himself is better than Manery and Miller combined? Now you're really losing it. No, I'm just saying that if the Shakrs get Holt, Sooner and Holt are better than Miller and Manery, but , if the Dawgs get Holt, Miller, Manery, and Holt are better than Sooner. |
|
|
|
Post by captobvious on Aug 13, 2006 15:33:45 GMT -5
Manning/DeBomb - wash Watson/Mosca - advantage Sharks Sooner+nobody/Holt+Manery+Miller - huge advantage Dawgs Sexxxy/Beast - slight advantage Dawgs Ummm... that's why. haha, except manning is better, maybe not a ton but still is and you have Holt on the wrong side. How is Manning better? He's got some extra speed on me, but in this game QBs never run. Are those 2pts extra on BTK and CAR going to take him over the top? |
|
WilBEER
Crazy People
Macho Mod (in his own mind)
Posts: 751
|
Post by WilBEER on Aug 13, 2006 15:36:37 GMT -5
How is Manning better? He's got some extra speed on me, but in this game QBs never run. Are those 2pts extra on BTK and CAR going to take him over the top? You are trying to compare yourself with the Commishinor, the first ever member, a S1 vet, and QB of the year 2 years running? |
|
|
|
Post by Eielson on Aug 13, 2006 15:39:10 GMT -5
haha, except manning is better, maybe not a ton but still is and you have Holt on the wrong side. How is Manning better? He's got some extra speed on me, but in this game QBs never run. Are those 2pts extra on BTK and CAR going to take him over the top? He is faster and has little more THP and THA. Yeah, it isn't much but I don't see how you can say that you guys are even and he is either better or even at every category. |
|
|
|
Post by travis on Aug 13, 2006 15:40:12 GMT -5
How is Manning better? He's got some extra speed on me, but in this game QBs never run. Are those 2pts extra on BTK and CAR going to take him over the top? You are trying to compare yourself with the Commishinor, the first ever member, a S1 vet, and QB of the year 2 years running? I was the second member but Im just average, GINO I am better than you, because I was the second member of this league period you cant even argue this  |
|
|
|
Post by captobvious on Aug 13, 2006 15:41:17 GMT -5
I'll start the season at 97. It''ll take me all of two weeks to get to 99. If it were at all significant, I'd just pay myself an extra 500k and get the 99 out of camp.
|
|
|
|
Post by travis on Aug 13, 2006 15:42:37 GMT -5
NO IM better than you, you were a season 2 player I was a season 1 duhhhh thats like saying lucas is better than gino |
|
WilBEER
Crazy People
Macho Mod (in his own mind)
Posts: 751
|
Post by WilBEER on Aug 13, 2006 15:42:55 GMT -5
You are trying to compare yourself with the Commishinor, the first ever member, a S1 vet, and QB of the year 2 years running? I was the second member but Im just average, GINO I am better than you, because I was the second member of this league period you cant even argue this Trav, you went inactive for a while and last I recall you were a MLB with 40 THA. |
|
|
|
Post by travis on Aug 13, 2006 15:43:50 GMT -5
No my stats got switched around by watch this or someone....Hey Im almost up to 50 Overall woot
|
|
|
|
Post by Eielson on Aug 13, 2006 15:43:56 GMT -5
Even if you were completely even we would still be better than the Dawgs.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eielson on Aug 13, 2006 15:50:23 GMT -5
This just doesn't add up, Dawgs think they are better than the Sharks but they have a hard time arguing the case that they are even with the Dawgs at ONE position!
|
|
|
|
Post by travis on Aug 13, 2006 15:55:09 GMT -5
Manning/DeBomb - It really is almost a wash, so close theres no difference
Watson/Mosca - Sharkss
Sooner+nobody/Manery+Miller - Advantage Dawgs
Sexxxy/Beast - Beast is better than Sexxxy
|
|
|
|
Post by Eielson on Aug 13, 2006 15:57:04 GMT -5
Manning/DeBomb - It really is almost a wash, so close theres no difference Watson/Mosca - Sharkss Sooner+nobody/Manery+Miller - Advantage Dawgs Sexxxy/Beast - Beast is better than Sexxxy You left off defense. If you say Manning and Debomb is a wash than so is Beast and Sexxxy. And we will have a #2 WR. |
|
|
|
Post by captobvious on Aug 13, 2006 18:32:45 GMT -5
Manning/DeBomb - It really is almost a wash, so close theres no difference Watson/Mosca - Sharkss Sooner+nobody/Manery+Miller - Advantage Dawgs Sexxxy/Beast - Beast is better than Sexxxy You left off defense. If you say Manning and Debomb is a wash than so is Beast and Sexxxy. And we will have a #2 WR. We were never arguing about defense. I can hardly begin to argue for my defense until I get two major holes shored up. We were arguing about offense. I said our offense would be better than yours with Holt, and that has now been proven. As far as I'm concerned, the debate is over. |
|
|
|
Post by Eielson on Aug 13, 2006 20:18:20 GMT -5
You left off defense. If you say Manning and Debomb is a wash than so is Beast and Sexxxy. And we will have a #2 WR. We were never arguing about defense. I can hardly begin to argue for my defense until I get two major holes shored up. We were arguing about offense. I said our offense would be better than yours with Holt, and that has now been proven. As far as I'm concerned, the debate is over. Yeah, if you had Holt, the thing is that you probably won't have Holt, with Holt we will be far better. |
|
|
|
Post by XY on Aug 13, 2006 20:36:45 GMT -5
No offense to captobvious but Manning is the Co-MVP adn QB of the year. Its about the stats not attributes. So id give it to Manning
Watson/Mosca - Watson is better
WR's once Free Agency ends ill get back to you
Sexxxy/Beast - Sexxxy is the TE of the year.
Your arguing against two Players of the year at their respective positions. I couldn't say Dawgs win either one. Sexxxy and Beast is close ill give you that but id take Sexxxy even putting my biased opinions aside.
|
|
too Ty.
