|
Post by []D [] []v[] []D on Aug 2, 2006 20:31:58 GMT -5
Sorry everyone that i have not been able to post on here much, but I have been busy trying to run my league!! But I deleted it so i could be more active on here!! So the lines are open!!
1st Topic-Pro Bowl..Who do you thinks in? Whos out? Who should be in, but wont get in?
|
|
|
Post by Leroy Jenkins on Aug 2, 2006 21:02:05 GMT -5
Well not to seem arrogant, but I think I deserve a pro-bowl spot. Besides I only follow the CB and some offensive ones.
|
|
|
Post by []D [] []v[] []D on Aug 2, 2006 23:38:47 GMT -5
Yes u deserve 2!!
|
|
D:F:11
Draftee
Deuce Fitzgerald WR #11
Posts: 374
|
Post by D:F:11 on Aug 2, 2006 23:39:30 GMT -5
Im in. But I should be higher.
|
|
|
Post by []D [] []v[] []D on Aug 3, 2006 1:26:40 GMT -5
No you dont, as much as I like you and hate Jackson!!! He deserves to be over you!! And Steeves and Holt def. deserve to be over you!! But you had a great season!! Good Job!!
|
|
|
Post by []D [] []v[] []D on Aug 3, 2006 1:27:30 GMT -5
What is g@y is I will probably miss the Pro-Bowl, because i play in the East (with Dangerfield, Gap, Smokes, and McKee)!!
|
|
|
Post by The Mule on Aug 3, 2006 1:32:34 GMT -5
What is g@y is I will probably miss the Pro-Bowl, because i play in the East (with Dangerfield, Gap, Smokes, and McKee)!! Maybe you need to step your game up
|
|
|
Post by []D [] []v[] []D on Aug 3, 2006 2:51:20 GMT -5
i have stepped my game up!! I have 65 tackles and 9 PDs!! I believe Im 3rd in the league in tackles!! Behind Smokes and you!! But this league is so biased on INTs and Sacks!!
|
|
|
Post by jellyman on Aug 3, 2006 6:07:17 GMT -5
Baker, I think I should be higher than Sundine. I mean, I've helped Vick on runs, Lipton on passes, and I've just been a pretty quiet contributer to our awesome offense.
|
|
|
Post by Tye Williams on Aug 3, 2006 9:16:58 GMT -5
But this league is so biased on INTs and Sacks!! I am the West's #1 CB with 2 INTs. The #2 has 7. Where's the bias on that one?
|
|
|
Post by Leroy Jenkins on Aug 3, 2006 9:40:44 GMT -5
I have 4 INTs, 13 Deflections, 1 TD, 36 some tackles and no pro bowl spot. Its really bias. ITs pretty much a popularity contest
|
|
|
Post by watchthis on Aug 3, 2006 9:47:42 GMT -5
Name the person you should be in there over, oh great cornerback for the second worst defense in the league.
|
|
|
Post by Leroy Jenkins on Aug 3, 2006 10:01:58 GMT -5
Name the person you should be in there over, oh great cornerback for the second worst defense in the league. Its ridicoulus. Its our LBs not our secondary. The running game is killing us. I should be over most people. I mean the 4th Cb doesn't even have an INT.
|
|
|
Post by Leroy Jenkins on Aug 3, 2006 10:02:39 GMT -5
Name the person you should be in there over, oh great cornerback for the second worst defense in the league. Also they make the running game overpowered. I mean its ridiculus how many performance points the offense gets.
|
|
|
Post by watchthis on Aug 3, 2006 10:03:53 GMT -5
Nah, it's just ridiculous how easy it is to run on the Falcons. You won't be saying that if Camel was any good at all.
|
|
|
Post by Leroy Jenkins on Aug 3, 2006 10:09:41 GMT -5
Nah, it's just ridiculous how easy it is to run on the Falcons. You won't be saying that if Camel was any good at all. Compare how many Performance points to lets say John Smith who has 7 Ints. Dude you know its overpowered.
|
|
|
Post by watchthis on Aug 3, 2006 10:10:30 GMT -5
We also have more catagories we have to put stats in.
|
|
|
Post by watchthis on Aug 3, 2006 10:12:06 GMT -5
We have 7 major catagories for stats and you guys have 4 or 5. But every running back has the same amount of PP possible, so it doesn't really matter as long as it's equal for every players.
|
|
|
Post by watchthis on Aug 3, 2006 10:15:48 GMT -5
Did you know you're the only offense to socre under 300 points in the league? The next worst has 324, and you guys only have 244. That's an 80 point difference.
|
|
|
Post by captobvious on Aug 3, 2006 14:30:53 GMT -5
Baker has had an outstanding season. Looking at the stats through week 11, the difference between him and the rest of the candidates is razor thin. He stands shoulder to shoulder with all of those guys. You could pick any combination of Dangerfield, Gap, Smokes, McKee, and Baker for the Pro Bowl and feel very good about your secondary. The problem is that someone in this group has to be left out, and choosing which one is a very difficult proposition.
If we hadn't traded for him he'd have been a no-brainer pick for the Pro Bowl. The downside is, it would have been as a Falcon.
|
|